Isaak Lagerman

Case study

08 / 09FOREFRONT CONSULTING · STRATEGY ENGAGEMENT2025

A peer benchmark and structural review shaped around new EU pay-transparency requirements.

A competitive benchmark and structural review supporting Forefront's move toward a more formal, criteria-based compensation model.

Forefront compensation-structure strategy engagement

Challenge

New EU pay-transparency rules increased the need for Forefront to justify pay differences through a clear and defensible compensation structure.

My contribution

I benchmarked five peer firms using compensation frameworks shared by former employees, then contributed structural recommendations through weekly to bi-weekly working sessions with the CEO, HR Director and leadership.

Approach

Compared compensation frameworks sourced from former employees of five peer firms.

Identified role-specific criteria as a more defensible alternative to one shared criteria set.

Contributed recommendations on career levels and differentiated expectations across career tracks, while final model decisions remained with Forefront.

Outcome

Many of the structural suggestions were reflected in Forefront's adopted compensation framework.

Deliverables

  • Peer-firm benchmark
  • Structural findings
  • Career-level recommendations
  • Leadership working sessions

What explains market value?

An interpretable equity-valuation study comparing OLS with regularized regression models.

KTH BSc thesis on equity-valuation regression

Have a similar problem?

Bring the context, constraints and desired outcome. I can help define the most useful first step.

Start a conversation