I — L
Case study08 / 09
OrganisationRegulation

Make pay structures defensible.

A competitive benchmark and structural review supporting Forefront's move toward a more formal, criteria-based compensation model.

Forefront compensation-structure strategy engagement
Engagement

Forefront Consulting · Strategy engagement

Role

Strategy and product analyst

Year

2025

5

peer compensation models benchmarked

01 · Challenge

Challenge

New EU pay-transparency rules increased the need for Forefront to justify pay differences through a clear and defensible compensation structure.

02 · My contribution

My contribution

I benchmarked five peer firms and contributed structural recommendations through recurring working sessions with the CEO, HR Director and leadership.

03 · Outcome

Outcome

Many of the structural suggestions were reflected in Forefront's adopted compensation framework.

Approach

Approach

  1. 01

    Compared compensation frameworks sourced from former employees of five peer firms.

  2. 02

    Identified role-specific criteria as a more defensible alternative to one shared criteria set.

  3. 03

    Contributed recommendations on career levels and differentiated expectations across career tracks.

Deliverables
Peer-firm benchmarkStructural findingsCareer-level recommendationsLeadership working sessions
Next case study

What explains market value?

Read the case study
KTH BSc thesis on equity-valuation regression
Back to all workDiscuss a similar project